<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watchlist for 11/11: The next GVBP!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/</link>
	<description>Reaping Profits by Trading Penny Stocks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:11:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reaper</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>nope. was working on my next blog post (just posted).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope. was working on my next blog post (just posted).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3354</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3354</guid>
		<description>SYPR breaking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SYPR breaking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3353</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3353</guid>
		<description>NANO acting nicely so far, did you get in on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NANO acting nicely so far, did you get in on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>NANO trying to break out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NANO trying to break out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3351</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3351</guid>
		<description>Heads up TRE breaking out again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heads up TRE breaking out again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaper</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is your ramble for the week. You get only one ;)

The low volume ones, once they breakout, if they go a lot higher, they do usually get a lot of volume coming in when they break the hod. It is generally accepted among traders that things breaking out on low-volume (relative to average volume) are less likely to continue up than those breaking out on high volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is your ramble for the week. You get only one <img src='http://www.reapertrades.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The low volume ones, once they breakout, if they go a lot higher, they do usually get a lot of volume coming in when they break the hod. It is generally accepted among traders that things breaking out on low-volume (relative to average volume) are less likely to continue up than those breaking out on high volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>Am I wrong in my thinking that when the volume is lower that it could run higher, is that flawed thinking.
My theory is that since the volume is low that it would be easy to push up, instead of the volume being higher and the momo&#039;s are gone already.
I have a early mover scan that picks up anything over 10% and 100k shares traded, it has produced some of the decent charts that I seldom mention.
I guess it&#039;s a give and take, some could run and the others just fizzle out.
Another thing I wanted to mention after trading EONC fairly successful, fairly because I could have gotten in much higher following my rules. I waited for two weeks for a trade that fit the criteria I have set for those type of movers and just when I thought it was all but over one presented itself and I flubbed it up.
I know there is a lesson to be taught here, maybe never give up on a decently proven method of trading..... I don&#039;t know until I see and make another good play but I was very frustrated before that trade. Not like quiting frustrated but maybe you know what I mean.
It&#039;s very nice when you can make a trade and know the outcome before entering, I know that sounds cocky but I was very comfortable during most of those winning trades, maybe to comfortable.
Now I know how you feel about that, I did only have a few trades, but they were my trades and nobody elses. Maybe you remember some of your first trades that you called well, there is a sense of satisfaction in that.
My ramble for the week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I wrong in my thinking that when the volume is lower that it could run higher, is that flawed thinking.<br />
My theory is that since the volume is low that it would be easy to push up, instead of the volume being higher and the momo&#8217;s are gone already.<br />
I have a early mover scan that picks up anything over 10% and 100k shares traded, it has produced some of the decent charts that I seldom mention.<br />
I guess it&#8217;s a give and take, some could run and the others just fizzle out.<br />
Another thing I wanted to mention after trading EONC fairly successful, fairly because I could have gotten in much higher following my rules. I waited for two weeks for a trade that fit the criteria I have set for those type of movers and just when I thought it was all but over one presented itself and I flubbed it up.<br />
I know there is a lesson to be taught here, maybe never give up on a decently proven method of trading&#8230;.. I don&#8217;t know until I see and make another good play but I was very frustrated before that trade. Not like quiting frustrated but maybe you know what I mean.<br />
It&#8217;s very nice when you can make a trade and know the outcome before entering, I know that sounds cocky but I was very comfortable during most of those winning trades, maybe to comfortable.<br />
Now I know how you feel about that, I did only have a few trades, but they were my trades and nobody elses. Maybe you remember some of your first trades that you called well, there is a sense of satisfaction in that.<br />
My ramble for the week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaper</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3348</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3348</guid>
		<description>volume low there, even after the breakout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>volume low there, even after the breakout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3347</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3347</guid>
		<description>SNTS breaking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SNTS breaking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.reapertrades.com/2009/11/watchlist-for-1111-the-next-gvbp/comment-page-1/#comment-3346</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reapertrades.com/?p=1204#comment-3346</guid>
		<description>Whoa, sorry about that, it&#039;s OTC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, sorry about that, it&#8217;s OTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
